
Dissemination,
Marketing and Networking Conference for Socrates Project Co-ordinators and
Partners
Between Ideal and Fait Accompli
Feelings
and opinions collected from the Conference participants
One
important aspect that could be seen in the evaluation material collected
by the organizers was the widespread appreciation of the fortunate
combination between these two major vectors: European projects with a
linguistic component as producers of successful and high-quality products on
the one hand, and the marketing strategies that might allow these products to
achieve a high degree of sustainability, visibility and accessibility on the
other hand. Most of the participants admitted to having perceived certain
mentalities when it came to applying marketing principles to the products
(language courses, language learning strategies and methodologies) developed
within the framework of European financing for languages.
“I used to believe marketing experts regarded us with some
sort of skepticism and I in turn was rather reluctant to their pragmatic manner
of referring to the outputs of our projects. “Selling” is not a word teachers
react well to, since we’ve all developed a sense of possessiveness and
belonging over the materials we produced – they reflect who we are as
individuals, not just as representatives of a consortium”.
This statement (included in one of the feedback forms) is highly
illustrative of the mentality that the DissMark
I conference aimed to tackle – the reluctance of educators to perceive
the results of their work as marketable products. According to the feedback we
received, the overall perception of the participants was greatly influenced by
the conference and the way in which the topic of valorisation
was dealt with, in a manner that was less theoretical and abstract and more
focused on concrete examples.
In
addition, the participants commented on the great degree of innovative
dissemination channels they learnt about, such as:
Furthermore,
the plenaries and workshops centered on marketing
issues highlighted the fact that increasing a project’s visibility
and setting a price for some of its outputs does not come as an undermining
factor to its acknowledgement in terms of quality and accessibility. On the
contrary, the general perception is that whatever is free is not necessarily of
good quality, and the former and current project coordinators were presented
with coherent, relevant information as to what they could do to turn this into
an advantage in their own work.
“I
think the main thing to do is be open – and stop flinching when someone thinks
about actually selling the stuff me make – it’s a mark of quality and not an
insult of some sort. This was a good lesson. I’ll keep it in mind for my next
project”, one participant commented.
On
the whole, DissMark I was an event whose
true impact at both individual and community level will only become evident
after the participants have had enough time to explore the newly discovered
opportunities and directions of development, try out their relevance and
integrate them within their own individual and
institutional contexts. It was a success from many points of view and a lesson
learnt in what concerns blending marketing and project dissemination strategies
together into a successful mix.
“It was an excellent networking opportunity. I wasn’t aware there were
so many other successful projects out there. I made some good contacts and I’m
looking forward to following up with them in the near future”.
“I believe we’ve all had a lot to learn from DissMark.
There were so many new ideas, I hope I’ll have a
chance to explore all the possibilities”.